Lawmakers turn to tech sector for answers on 2016 election

Technology


WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Lawyers from Facebook Inc (FB.O), Twitter Inc (TWTR.N) and Alphabet Inc’s (GOOGL.O) Google head before U.S. lawmakers on Tuesday for two days of hearings on how Russia allegedly used their services to try to sway the 2016 U.S. elections.

The U.S. Senate’s crime subcommittee will be the first of three congressional committees to hold hearings on Russia. Its hearing is set for 2:30 p.m. EDT (1830 GMT).

At stake for the Silicon Valley companies are their public images and the threat of tougher advertising regulations in the United States, where the technology sector has grown accustomed to light treatment from the government.

U.S. Senator Mark Warner, vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, told reporters on Tuesday he is waiting on the companies to explain how they were misused.

“What we’re seeing is incremental progress from all of these firms,” said Warner, a Democrat. He said he has “serious questions for Facebook,” in particular.

Facebook, the world’s largest social network, added fuel to the debate on Monday when it told Congress in written testimony that 126 million Americans may have seen politically divisive posts that originated in Russia under fake names.

That is in addition to 3,000 U.S. political ads that Facebook says Russians bought on its platform.

Google and Twitter have also said that people in Russia used their services to spread messages in the run-up to last year’s U.S. presidential election.

The Russian government has denied it intended to influence the election, in which President Donald Trump, a Republican, defeated Democrat Hillary Clinton.

(L-R) Colin Stretch, general counsel for Facebook; Sean Edgett, acting general counsel for Twitter; and Richard Salgado, director of law enforcement and information security at Google, are sworn in prior to testifying before Senate Judiciary Crime and Terrorism Subcommittee hearing on on “ways to combat and reduce the amount of Russian propaganda and extremist content online,” on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., October 31, 2017. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

U.S. lawmakers, including Warner, have responded angrily to the idea of foreign meddling, introducing legislation to require online platforms to say who is running election ads and what audiences are targeted.

“The companies need to get ahead of the curve here,” said James Lewis, senior vice president of the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies. If they can, he added, they might avoid regulation.

Lewis, speaking during the Reuters Cyber Summit in Washington, said he expects European officials to watch the U.S. hearings closely.

Facebook and Twitter are dispatching their general counsels, Colin Stretch and Sean Edgett, to appear before the crime subcommittee on Tuesday, while Google is sending its director of law enforcement and information security, Richard Salgado.

“Our goal is to bring people closer together; what we saw from these actors was an insidious attempt to drive people apart. And we’re determined to prevent it from happening again,” Stretch will tell lawmakers, according to an advance copy of his remarks.

Facebook and Twitter have taken steps toward self-regulation, saying they would create their own public archives of election-related ads and also apply more specific labels to such ads.

Google followed on Monday, saying it would create a database of election ads, including ones on YouTube.

The companies, meanwhile, have disclosed new details about the extent of Russia-based material, raising alarms about a sector that once inspired idealism.

“The internet was seen as a great engine for promoting democracy and transparency. Now we are all discovering that it can also be a tool for hijacking democracy,” said Karen Kornbluh, a senior fellow for digital policy at the Council on Foreign Relations.

Reporting by David Ingram in Washington; Additional reporting by Dustin Volz in Washington and Paresh Dave in San Francisco; Editing by Mary Milliken and Jonathan Oatis

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.



Source link

Products You May Like

Articles You May Like

First U.S. trial opens in FIFA corruption probe
Brazil GP security tightened after armed robbery
Stunned Italy fail to reach World Cup as Sweden qualify
AXA confirms 2020 targets amid management shake-up
White House plans to seek another $45 billion in U.S. hurricane aid

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *